Sunday, April 10, 2005

White House Wants Detainee Ruling Reversed ... alow trials without seeing evidence ... `This is the law in Rwanda'' but not in the United States

The New York Times > AP > National > White House Wants Detainee Ruling Reversed: "By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS | Published: April 8, 2005 | Filed at 12:23 a.m. ET

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Lawyers for a Guantanamo Bay detainee ran into tough questioning Thursday from a federal appeals court that is being pressed by the Bush administration to allow military trials that don't afford foreign terror suspects the same legal protections as Americans."
...
Navy Lt. Cmdr. Charles Swift, one of Hamdan's Pentagon-appointed lawyers, pointed out his client was barred from the courtroom when his trial began.

``It makes no sense to say that we adhere to international law and the first thing we do at the beginning of a trial is violate a canon of international law,''
Swift told three judges for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. ...
...
Out of the roughly 550 detainees at Guantanamo Bay, just 15 have been designated for such trials and only four have been charged. Among them is Hamdan, a mechanic with a fourth-grade education who left his home country of Yemen looking for work. He is charged with conspiracy to engage in acts of terrorism.
...
During the appeals court arguments, Judge A. Raymond Randolph noted other countries' legal systems don't allow a defendant to be present for all parts of a trial. And some countries don't allow cross-examination of witnesses, Judge John Roberts added.

``This is the law in Rwanda'' but not in the United States, Swift replied.

No comments: